IVolatility.com - data and services usage: Advanced Options Page - Part II
After a long break, we return to the description of our Advanced Options Page service. In this newsletter, we'll cover the use of Implied Volatility, greeks, contract volume and open interest in trading and risk management. The previous newsletter on this topic can be found here
Quotes, Volume and Open Interest
Let's first look at the very basic option data - closing bid/ask quote, volume and open interest - see Fig.1. The following information can be extracted from these values:
Bid/Ask - if your trading horizon is short (say, a couple of days to a week), you should carefully examine the bid/ask spread. It is an indicator of an options liquidity, and gives a hints to the slippage incurred. For example, take a look at the unusually large spread of $0.30 for August 90 Calls. The option is close to the money ($87.07 as of Friday’s close), but such a spread makes this option unsuitable for "quick profit" opportunity - you will need a relatively large movement in the underlying to cover the slippage.
Volume and Open Interest are relevant in liquidity estimates as well. Minor value of volume means that "nobody trades" this contract now, and low open interest tells that "nobody is interested" in the contract at all. Generally, you should avoid options with low trading volume and / or open interest, unless you are completely sure what you are doing.
Finally, Change (%) column shows the absolute and relative change in option price from previous close (Thursday's in our case). As the basics of Technical Analysis teach us, the change in price should be confirmed by high volume and open interest, otherwise the price trend will revert soon. However, options are rather complex instruments, so one should not rely on the TA solely.
Implied Volatility and Greeks
We've dedicated quite a number of newsletters to the usage of Implied Volatility and related indicators, which you may review here. On a very basic level, it is attractive to buy low implied volatility and sell high - as implied volatility is the options cost. One thing to be aware of, is that not all the options have implied vola. We mark the options having a too low or too high implied volatility (outside the 1% ... 250 % range) by an asterisk symbol (*) in Advanced Options. Also, we take the implied volatility figure for them from the other option in the pair, or interpolate it. You should not use this interpolated value in deciding how cheap / expensive the option is. The only purpose for which this value can serve is calculation of the Greeks (and we use it in this way indeed). It is very easy to understand when the implied vola too low (option price close to intrinsic value for ITM option) or too high (high option price for OTM option).
Now, the Greeks shown in Advanced Options are the common ones used for vanilla options: Delta, Gamma, Theta, Alpha, Vega and Rho. We'll give below the definition of each and sketch the information they give for the management of trading risks.
Delta is the sensitivity of an option price to underlying price, which ranges from 0 to 1 for Calls and from -1 to 0 for Puts. It is also a rough estimate of probability for options to expire in-the-money. Buying of cheap low delta options (well below 50 %) on a regular basis would hardly improve your budget, as the odds are not on your side. Buying of large delta (well above 50 %) options cannot be recommended as well, as you will hardly earn more compared to naked stock purchase (or sale for Put). If you look at Fig. 1, you'll see that options with strikes different from 85 and 90 (closest to the money) are scarcely worth trading in front month (August) expiry. For further expiries, more strikes have deltas in the acceptable range, as there is more time left.
Gamma is a sensitivity of Delta to the underlying price. Its other meaning is the sensitivity of an option price to large spot movements. It is "nice and easy" to be long Gamma (having a net positive Gamma), since your profits will be accelerated, and losses - decelerated, in comparison with naked stock position. On the other hand, being short Gamma will decelerate profits and accelerate losses. Of course, such an unpleasant thing is usually compensated by a higher probability of profit and/or larger profit potential. Since all the vanilla options (both Calls and Puts) have positive gammas, the popular strategies of Naked Put or Covered Call writing are short Gamma and therefore risky. For them, the risk is compensated by a large profit probability. But you should look for low gamma options if employing a naked option sale. The only drawback of being long Gamma is that such a position has negative Theta (wastes away in value over the course of time, all other factors unchanged). This is yet another tradeoff the option trader should be prepared for. We'll dwell in more details when discussing Alpha below.
Theta is a difference between option values tomorrow and today, other factors being equal. All the vanilla options have negative theta and therefore called "wasting assets" (there is a minor exception for European style options, but we will not discuss it here). An option writer hopes that time decay will at least compensate for other factors, and he/she will gain profit due to the option "time decay". As we've seen, the writer pays for this, taking more risk due to negative gamma.
Alpha is a way to compare risks and rewards provided by Gamma and Theta, described above. This value is just a ratio of gamma over theta. It is never positive, so we'll talk about its absolute value in what follows, to make things easier. Large alpha means the selling of the option concerned with large risk - as time decay is not sufficient to compensate the option price advance due to the movement in underlying. By the same reason, low alpha option is hardly a candidate for buying - too large a movement in underlying is needed to compensate the time decay. If you'll have a look at Fig. 1, you'll see a clear "outlier" - alpha of 145 for Aug 95 Put. So is this a best candidate for the naked purchase? Basically, no, as it's large delta of 98.5 % does not make the option attractive at all. So let's look at the options with strikes of 85 and 90, which were determined more or less attractive by delta criterion earlier. They have alphas of about 4-5 - is this high or low ? Interesting to know, that there exists a rough estimate for "fair value" of the alpha, in frames of the commonly used option pricing model (Black-Scholes):
Alpha "fair value" = 2 * 365 / (IV^2 * S^2),
where IV is option contract implied volatility, S - underlying price, and we omitted the minus sign again. Alphas larger than "fair value" are generally attractive for purchase, and lower - for the sale. Table 1 below compares the market value of alphas for 85 and 90 options with their theoretical fair values:
Tab. 1. Market and theoretical Alpha for near the money IBM August options
It is seen that all the values are close to their theoretical estimates, maybe except Aug 90 Put - considerably larger alpha makes this option an attractive candidate for purchase. But, its delta is still high (83 %), so probably September Put looks better (delta 71 %, alpha 4.42, theo alpha 3.72)
Vega is the sensitivity of an options price to implied volatility. It is a difference between option price, should implied vola be 1 % (absolute) higher and current market price. It is always positive for vanilla options, both Calls and Puts. There is one good reason to avoid large vegas, as they make your position too sensitive to mispricing of options, be it due to the wrong sentiment on the stock or other reasons. Large Vega makes your position "directional" in volatility, which means that adverse movement in implied volatility will wipe your profits and return them into losses. Of course, near the money options have the largest vegas, and they fade moving towards ITM or OTM. Different spreading strategies are good way to hedge this risk (as well as most risks described above). Employing a spreading strategy with options similar to each other is always a good protection, since they experience similar changes in value and compensate each other.
Finally, Rho is a Greek that is rarely taken care of, given low and stable interest rates (risk free rate). It is a difference between option price should interest rate be 1 % higher and current market price. Though, if you are dealing with long-term options (LEAPS), you need to consider this risk and hedge against it properly.